Author Archive for brian

Beat It, Jerk

Published by
brian
February 24, 2010 in Social Media. 0 Comments

When I was a kid, I never wanted to let my younger brothers play with my toys.  It’s not that I was selfish & wanted to keep them from having fun, it’s that I KNEW they would break shit.  But, because my parents insisted I share, I relented & occasionally would come home from school to what used to be a perfectly working toy (still waiting for that Soundwave replacement fellas).  My position was one we all find ourselves in very often; stuck in the middle of a battle you think you should win, but knowing it is one you will not (notice I did not say cannot).

This is how I feel about social media; I’m stuck in between the social media “experts” & people I wish had no access to it.  Most days I read a few blog posts or tweets from said experts & get frustrated (actually, there’s only like 2 or 3 that annoy me).  I might be at my wit’s end with being told how social media works or how everyone should do this or that.  It’s the same stuff you already know cloaked in verbose Abraham-Hicks-eque words.  Look, I can do that for you right now – The closer your brand comes to being in harmony with your community, the more in harmony you are with potential brand advocates.  When you think of the wants & needs of your customers & identify how you can fill those gaps, you weave yourself into the very fabric of the community. Total BS.  If those 2 sentences meant something to you, please leave this site immediately.

Seriously.  If I told you that you needed to listen & interact more regularly & on a one-to-one basis with your customers along with leveraging your marketing efforts to learn more about potential customers, your response very well might be, “No shit.”

Well, there’s social media for you.  Now make sure you have clearly outlined goals & objectives, a supporting strategy, & the people with the know-how to execute it.  You didn’t really come here to learn anything new about interactive marketing did you?  Dummy.

I oversimplify this because I’m trying to make a point.  You are not a sheep so stop being herded like one.  Use your brain, rely on your experience, & ask lots of questions.  You’ll gain a lot more traction & get things done faster than trying to figure out how to reshape your world into the mold of someone else’s self-indulgent internet presence.

My other beef is with the people that most likely make up the fastest growing segment of the social media space.  You’ve de-friended, hidden feeds, unfollowed, or blocked these people on Facebook, Twitter, Buzz, & Foursquare.  If it were up to me, I wouldn’t be sharing my toys with them.

The amount of server space that is dedicated to hosting inane Facebook groups, status updates, tweets, & creepers/stalkers has to be astronomical.  As much as I’d like to rant, I just ask that you go back to doing what you were before you discovered Farmville.  Maybe cut down how passionate you are about that kind of stuff.  One or the other would suffice.  Oh, also, don’t bleed your heart out on Facebook or Twitter.  It makes you look weak & now that it’s on the internet, it’s there to stay.

It’s possible I have no business criticizing people who clearly have more “experience” & make more money than I do.  Nor should I be any expert on what internet noobs (how is that possible in 2010?) do with their spare time.  But, I think I’m right & know this is a battle I can win.

A Smart Waste of Time

Published by
brian
April 7, 2009 in Ecommerce, Interactive Marketing, Link Dump, Online Video, Paid Search and Social Media. 0 Comments

It’s not like you’ve got anything else better to do…

  • Which URL Shortening Service Should You Use? -- Search Engine Land -- I thought everyone just picked what they thought looked/sounded the coolest.
  • URL Shorteners Are  Bad for Most of Us -- Joshua Schachter’s Blog -- Are they?  What do you think?  The only thing that bothers me is when they don’t work.
  • DIY Social Media Monitoring Dashboards -- Michael Leis -- Why just plugin when you can plugin & monitor?  It’s the logical next step…
  • The Top 5 Video Game Ninjas -- Unreality -- Ninja-related material is always must-read.
  • Twitter Traffic Explodes…And Not Being Driven By the Usual Suspects -- comScore Voices -- Even though the 18 -- 24 year old demographic has a low adoption rate compared to the rest of the olders demos, I see lots of growth coming in the next year.  I base this solely on the fact that my cousin, who’s a senior in college, is now tweeting.
  • Quarterly Online Sales Flash Survey, Q1 2009 Results -- Shop.org -- More than half of the retailers surveyed reported an increase in sales during Q1.
  • Pre-roll Ad Viewing Up, Interaction Down -- ReelSEO -- Not surprising that people looking for content they’d normally have to pay for are more willing to tolerate watch pre-roll.
  • Amazon Cuts Paid Search Affiliates -- Amazon Affiliate Blog -- I wonder if this has anything to do with the pending tax nexus changes.  Search Engine Marketing firms who dislike affiliates will tell you that other merchants should do the same.  What’s your opinion?
  • And when in doubt, think with your dipstick…or don’t.  I think I’ve found my Halloween costume.  I’m Scottish, I could pull it off.  Check out this behind the scenes video; it might be funnier than the commercial.

Retailer Nexus & The Advertising Tax

Published by
brian
March 28, 2009 in Advertising, Advertising Tax, Affiliate Tax and Ecommerce. 5 Comments

There is an issue that is developing almost daily & has passed a level where online retailers & the publishers within their affiliate marketing programs can no longer ignore or act as innocent bystanders.  In 2008, the state of New York passed a bill that changes an online retailer’s taxable nexus to include states in which affiliates drive online sales.

Before moving on, let’s define a few things in case this is unfamiliar or unclear.  Full details (specific to CA) found here.

  • Nexus is the level of connection with a state necessary under the U.S. Commerce Clause to permit the state to impose a tax or a sales tax collection duty on out-of-state businesses doing business in the state.
  • Sales tax is imposed on a state’s retailers based on gross receipts from the sales of tangible goods.
  • Use tax is imposed on a state’s consumers who purchase goods from out-of-state retailers.
  • If a sales tax is not collected, consumers are supposed to submit it as a user tax.  But, honestly, who do you know that does that?

If you were a merchant with retail trade presence in NY, this had zero effect on you.  Online retailers without a trade presence in NY were faced with the choice of now taxing customers or removing affiliates who reside in NY from their program.  The negative impact is obvious; any affiliate registered in NY lost a revenue stream if they were dropped from the merchant’s program.  That merchant also potentially lost a revenue-driving affiliate or put another hurdle into the customer’s purchase decision process (charging sales tax).

Similar to the legislature passed in New York, several states (CA, CT, MN, HI, IL, TN, & NC) are now considering enacting their own that will affect retailers’ taxable nexus. Digging a little deeper, under these bills, a retailer making taxable sales is presumed to be soliciting business through an independent contractor (affiliates) if that retailer enters into an agreement with a resident of a state under which the resident, for a commission or other consideration, refers potential customers. In many cases, this provision only applies if the cumulative gross receipts from sales by an affiliate exceed a certain amount (I’ve seen ranges of $2k to $10k).

The problem with this is that affiliates are not exactly independent contractors.  In my opinion, the fact that they are called affiliates, in this case, is misleading.  It does not mean the same in the online marketing world as it does elsewhere.  While there are many affiliates with fairly large businesses, a good amount of affiliates work from home & are the independent/entrepreneurial people we should be rewarding, not penalizing.

As a retailer, the short-term & easy solution would be to remove the affiliates if the legislature is passed, state-by-state.  However, there is a good possibility this will gain momentum throughout the rest of the states.  If it becomes nationwide & your initial action is to kick out affiliates, you will have a difficult time getting them back.  There is also speculation that the legal language could be written loose enough to include the likes of search engines & interactive ad agencies.

I am sure you are quickly realizing how this makes zero sense.  In fact, precedence was set for this 20 years ago.

There is growing support from the likes of Google, LinkShare, Commission Junction, & many affiliates in general to get in touch with their local representatives & media outlets to spread the word, educate lawmakers & help defeat these bills in each state.  It seems as if lawmakers do not truly understand the impact this would have & are ignoring what has taken place in New York (many retailers completely dropping affiliates in that state).  Those supporting this legislation are simply seeing a pool of money that is not being taxed.  They do not understand that this is going to put more people in the unemployment line (less taxable income) & decrease sales for an online retailer in that state.

Here is a status by state; I probably will not do the best job at keeping this updated, though I will be actively aware of the issues.  Much of the information I have gleaned here has come from the resources listed at the bottom of this post.  A lot of the important due diligence & legwork has been done by Melanie Seery, Brian Littleton, & Missy Ward…at least their sites have been the resource for the majority of my content.

  • Connecticut: SB 806.  The  Joint Finance Committee vote was held on 3.26 & the bill was  approved.  The joint bill is now filed with the Legislative Commissioners’ Office. After fiscal analysis it will go to the Houses for vote & then on to the Governor.
  • California: AB178.  The bill was officially referred to the Committee on Revenue & Tax. The committee has set a hearing date for April 13.
  • Minnesota: SF 282 was supposed to be reviewed by MN’s Senate on 3.24, but was delayed. No further notification has been given on when it will be reviewed.
  • Hawaii: HB 1405.  The process will probably take another couple of weeks. I believe that the next steps are the 2nd & 3rd reading followed by the House vote, then on to the Governor.
  • Tennessee: SB 1741 & HB 1947.  Has been assigned to the House & Senate’s sub-committees.
  • North Carolina: HB 558 & SB S487.  Both Houses sent the bills to their Finance Committees earlier this month.
  • Illinois: Have heard this may be underway, but do not have any details yet.

I encourage you to not only read what’s been written, but also dive into the bills, by state.  It is not enough that we merely contact local representatives & send an email or letter.  If you want to persuade lawmakers, you are going to have to educate them.

What You Can Do

  • Educate yourself & others.
  • Spread the word.
  • Keep on top of the issues.
  • Speak directly with those in the online retail & affiliate marketing industries who are close to this.
  • Contact your local representatives.
  • Use your network to find out what media contacts you have.  If you have none, make them.
  • As an affiliate; find out what retailers are in these states as there will be a material impact on your business.
  • As an online retailer; don’t make any rash decisions & think long-term.  Ensure your online marketing team, agency, etc. & all key decision makers are tuned in & are looking at this strategically.  Openly communicate & collaborate with your affiliates.

Resources

Follow Along

5 Things I’m Sure Your Clients are Thinking or Doing

Published by
brian
February 6, 2009 in Ecommerce and Interactive Marketing. 0 Comments

While my main focus here is online retailers, I would venture to guess there are similarities for all online advertisers.  As always, there are exceptions to the rule, but these are not the only hot topics.  Please feel free to add your own (whether completely serious, in jest, or somewhere in between).

  1. Shifting marketing dollars to performance-based channels – email, paid search, affiliates, & search engine optimization (SEO).  The latter wouldn’t require much of an incremental investment if people simply adhered to the principles of good copywriting & building structurally sound web sites.  SEO is not that simple, but those 2 sure cover a lot.
  2. Realizing the rise in average cost-per-click on search engines was up higher than it should have been.
  3. Considering investing in things that will improve conversion, user experience, & customer service.
  4. Determining how to best reach customers on a more micro level (customized & more personal interactions)
  5. Asking you to do more with less.

If none of this is going on, I would say you are either extremely lucky or in big trouble.  The former because you (& your client) are then, somehow, isolated from the current economic factors.  The latter because your client is considering bringing things in-house or are talking to other, cheaper, agencies.  Or it could be because you simply suck…I know a few agencies that fit that bill.

As a Friday bonus, I’ve included a translation of the above for the cynics…

  1. The byproduct of performing your necessary due diligence.
  2. Digging a bit deeper to understand the cause of rising costs.
  3. What you should’ve been doing all along…how dare you treat your existing customers like commodities.
  4. Building & maintaining loyalty in an increasingly competitive space.
  5. What most like to call Doing Your Job.

« Previous Entries

TAG CLOUD

Subscribe to my RSS Feed

Get Updates Via Email:

Canonical URL by SEO No Duplicate WordPress Plugin